The pur­po­se of this paper is to ana­ly­ze the influence of dif­fe­rent dimen­si­ons of cor­po­ra­te gover­nan­ce qua­li­ty on the valua­ti­on of non-finan­cial firms lis­ted in the STOXX® Euro­pe 600 index over a peri­od from 2012 to 2017. Ins­tead of using a sin­gle gover­nan­ce mea­su­re that may cau­se bia­sed esti­ma­tes, we seek to cap­tu­re a more holi­stic per­spec­ti­ve on cor­po­ra­te gover­nan­ce. The­r­e­fo­re, we recrea­te a set of the most fre­quent­ly cited gover­nan­ce scores in the lite­ra­tu­re on a com­mon data­ba­se and car­ry out a prin­ci­pal com­po­nent ana­ly­sis to iden­ti­fy simi­la­ri­ties bet­ween the scores. Results reve­al that our cor­po­ra­te gover­nan­ce scores load on two gene­ral fac­tors that we iden­ti­fy to repre­sent inter­nal and exter­nal gover­nan­ce qua­li­ty. After con­s­truc­ting com­po­si­te gover­nan­ce mea­su­res for each of the­se fac­tors, we find that exter­nal (inter­nal) gover­nan­ce is posi­tively (nega­tively) lin­ked with firm valua­ti­on when app­ly­ing both fixed effects and IV regres­si­ons to account for endo­gen­ei­ty. Our fin­dings imply that sub­se­quent stu­dies on the gover­nan­ce-firm value rela­ti­onship need to include pro­xies for both exter­nal and inter­nal cor­po­ra­te gover­nan­ce quality …

Quel­le /​ Link: THE INFLUENCE OF INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL CORPORATE GOVERNANCE ON FIRM VALUE: EVIDENCE FROM STOXX® EUROPE 600 INDEX MEMBERS